There is a truth that academia whispers only in private.

A truth so embarrassing,

so uncomfortable,

so universally acknowledged

that institutions pretend it does not exist.

Students trust coaching centres

more than colleges.

Not because coaching is profound.

Not because coaching is noble.

Not because coaching is transformative.

Coaching does one thing:

it prepares students to perform.

Colleges do something else:

they prepare students to pass.

And in a world where performance decides futures,

the coach becomes the teacher,

and the teacher becomes the formality.

This is the underbelly academia hates to admit.

________________________________________

Scene 1: A Parent in Kota vs a Professor in a University

A parent visiting Kota says proudly,

“My child is learning more here than in school.”

A professor in a government college sighs,

“That’s the problem.”

Coaching centres deliver results.

Universities deliver degrees.

One creates confidence.

One creates transcripts.

Students know the difference.

________________________________________

Scene 2: The Coaching Classroom at 6 AM

Hundreds of students sit in a hall.

Focused.

Silent.

Terrified.

Determined.

The teacher walks in.

No time wasted.

No syllabus politics.

No committee bureaucracy.

He goes straight to the point:

“This is what will come.

This is how it is solved.

This is how you score.”

Students respect him because he respects their time.

Meanwhile, universities still take attendance manually.

________________________________________

Scene 3: The University Classroom at 11 AM

A professor walks in.

Students walk out mentally.

Half the class isn’t present.

The other half is present only physically.

The professor teaches from a book.

Coaching centres teach from patterns.

The difference is not knowledge.

The difference is intent.

________________________________________

Scene 4: The Global Parallel — Seoul, South Korea

A university dean admits privately,

“Hagwons prepare our students better than we do.”

His colleague adds,

“They teach pressure management.

We teach content management.”

Even in the world’s most competitive education systems,

coaching beats college.

________________________________________

Why Do Students Trust Coaching Centres More?

1. Coaching teaches performance, not theory

Results.

Speed.

Strategy.

Tricks.

Shortcuts.

Predictive patterns.

Applied thinking.

Universities teach chapters.

2. Coaching has accountability

If a coaching centre underperforms,

students leave.

Reputation collapses.

Market punishes instantly.

In universities, the market… does nothing.

Tenure protects effort.

Committees protect inefficiency.

Systems protect inertia.

3. Coaching adapts instantly

Exam pattern changes today,

teaching changes tomorrow.

Universities wait for:

• circulars,

• approvals,

• meetings,

• sub-committees,

• signatures,

• revised editions.

By the time they change,

the exam pattern changes again.

4. Coaching respects ambition

Coaching centres speak the language of results.

Universities speak the language of curriculum.

One says,

“We’ll get you there.”

The other says,

“Here is the syllabus.”

5. Coaching creates community

Students study together,

cry together,

compete together,

survive together.

Universities create batches.

Coaching creates tribes.

________________________________________

Scene 5: Placement Week Confession

A final-year engineering student tells his friend,

“I learned more about problem-solving from my coaching notes

than my four semesters combined.”

His friend nods,

“That’s why we don’t attend classes anymore.”

This is the underbelly universities quietly fear

but rarely confront.

________________________________________

The Emotional Root of This Crisis

Students are not disloyal.

They are desperate.

They want futures.

They want clarity.

They want confidence.

They want structure.

They want results.

When universities fail to offer these,

coaching centres step in —

not because they are better educators,

but because they are better listeners

to student anxieties.

Coaching centres understand fear.

Universities understand protocol.

And fear wins.

________________________________________

Scene 6: Conversation at a Policy Roundtable

An education secretary asks a veteran academic,

“Why can’t universities outperform coaching centres?”

The academic smiles bitterly,

“Because coaching centres compete.

We comply.”

Silence.

Because it’s true.

________________________________________

Underbelly Essence

Coaching centres are not the villains.

They are the symptom of what universities fail to do.

They fill the gap academia refuses to acknowledge:

the gap between knowledge and performance,

between syllabus and strategy,

between passing and winning.

Universities teach for exams.

Coaching teaches for life-changing outcomes.

And until universities reclaim urgency, accountability, and relevance,

students will always whisper a truth that academia hates:

“College gives the degree.

Coaching gives the future.”